A staff engineer at a scaling tech company told me about their managing director — someone with organizational authority, access to the best AI tools, and apparently a lot of enthusiasm for using them. The director had assigned themselves 30 development story points in a single sprint. The rest of the team was carrying 6 to 16 each.
“They vibe code everything,” the engineer said, shaking their head. Their team was left babysitting that output.
I’m not here to cast shade, and I’ve seen enough versions of this pattern to know it’s rarely malice — it’s excitement without governance. Glee without the long view. AI makes execution feel effortless, and when that feeling hits someone with organizational authority, the natural instinct is to run with it and stay in motion.
But I keep thinking about what a different story that could have been.
Imagine the same director, the same tools, and the same gap in formal coding skill. Instead of assigning themselves 30 points, they walk into a team standup and say:
“Here’s the problem I was trying to solve, and this is how I approached it with AI. Show me how you would do it the traditional way — and then show me how you would do it with the AI tooling we’ve implemented. Let’s talk through the strengths, drawbacks, and leverage opportunities for all three approaches.”
How different would that be for the team? For that leader? For the org’s health as a whole?
That’s not a weak play. That’s one of the highest-leverage moves a leader can make — using their own ignorance as an opportunity to build a structured learning platform. The team gets to teach. The leader gets to learn. The org gets a three-way comparison that surfaces assumptions, tradeoffs, and best practices that would otherwise stay locked in individual heads — or leave entirely when those people move on.
It becomes a running growth exercise. It compounds, to the good, for a change.
Instead, the reality
30 story points for someone who should be focused on meta-level engineering concerns. A team stuck babysitting their leader’s output. And an opportunity for something genuinely great quietly wasted.
AI gives leaders without deep technical chops a real reason to lean in — not for the first time, but never has it been so readily accessible. The question is whether they use that access to hoard capability or to build it.
The answer is what separates a manager from a leader.
Originally shared on LinkedIn.